理想和非理想信道估计下的高维调制叠加NOMA系统

doi:10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0065235

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着第5代移动通信技术（5G）的投入使用，传统的正交多址接入（OMA）技术难以完全满足5G多场景对通信速度和系统容量的需求，非正交多址（NOMA）技术以其高频谱效率和大接入容量的优势逐渐成为未来通信系统中的一项重要技术，但目前NOMA技术在信道估计误差下存在码字检测错误概率过高的问题。提出两种基于高维调制叠加的功率域NOMA系统，分别用于理想信道估计和非理想信道估计，并分析这两种双用户NOMA系统中两个用户码字检测错误概率的近似界，以提高功率域NOMA系统的性能。此外，基于近似界推导在给定码字检测错误概率的情况下使传输功率最小的最优功率分配因子。仿真结果表明，两种用户NOMA系统内用户的实际码字检测错误概率间的差距在理想和非理想信道估计下分别约为1 dB、2 dB，所提功率分配方案在增加较小运算量的情况下能有效提高系统码字检测性能。

关键词: 非正交多址接入, 功率分配, 球码, 高维调制, 信道估计

Abstract:

As the fifth generation mobile communication technology(5G) has been put into use, the traditional Orthogonal Multiple Access(OMA) technology is difficult to fully satisfy the requirements for communication speed and system capacity in 5G multi-scenes.Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access(NOMA) is becoming essential in future communication systems with advantages of high spectral efficiency and large access capacity.However, in NOMA technology, the error probability of code word detection is extremely high under the error of channel estimation. Two power-domain NOMA schemes based on high-dimensional modulation superposition are proposed: one is used in ideal channel estimation, and the other is under the condition of non-ideal channel estimation. The approximate bounds of the error probability of two user code word detection in these two dual-user NOMA systems are analyzed to improve the performance of power domain NOMA systems. In addition, based on the approximation bounds, this study derives the optimal power allocation factor, which can minimize the transmit power with a given word error probability. The simulation results show that under ideal and non-ideal channel estimation, the actual error probability of user codework detection of the gap between two users in the NOMA system is approximately 1 dB and 2 dB, respectively.The proposed power allocation scheme can effectively improve the detection performance of the system with minimal computation effort.

Key words: Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access(NOMA), power allocation, spherical code, high-dimensional modulation, channel estimation

邹骏, 赵心雨, 顾鹏, 孙继元. 理想和非理想信道估计下的高维调制叠加NOMA系统[J]. 计算机工程, 2023, 49(8): 111-121.

Jun ZOU, Xinyu ZHAO, Peng GU, Jiyuan SUN. High-Dimensional Modulation Superposition NOMA System with Ideal and Non-Ideal Channel Estimation[J]. Computer Engineering, 2023, 49(8): 111-121.

http://www.ecice06.com/CN/Y2023/V49/I8/111

图/表 14

图1 双用户NOMA系统模型

Fig.1 Two-user NOMA system model

图2 球码叠加NOMA的用户码字检测错误概率1

Fig.2 Error probability 1 of user codeword detection based on spherical code superposition NOMA

图3 球码叠加NOMA的用户码字检测错误概率2

Fig.3 Error probability 2 of user codeword detection based on spherical code superposition NOMA

图4 球码叠加NOMA的用户码字检测错误概率3

Fig.4 Error probability 3 of user codeword detection based on spherical code superposition NOMA

图5 球码叠加NOMA的用户码字检测错误概率4

Fig.5 Error probability 4 of user codeword detection based on spherical code superposition NOMA

图6 球码叠加NOMA的用户码字检测错误概率5

Fig.6 Error probability 5 of user codeword detection based on spherical code superposition NOMA

图7 不同信道估计误差下球码叠加NOMA的用户码字检测错误概率

Fig.7 Error probability of user codeword detection based on spherical code superposition NOMA under different channel estimation errors

图8 球码叠加NOMA的用户码字检测错误概率6

Fig.8 Error probability 6 of user codeword detection based on spherical code superposition NOMA

图9 球码叠加NOMA的用户码字检测错误概率7

Fig.9 Error probability 7 of user codeword detection based on spherical code superposition NOMA

图10 不同功率分配因子下球码叠加NOMA的用户码字检测错误概率1（

$ {{\sigma }}_{1}=0.01，{{\sigma }}_{2}=0.03 $

）

Fig.10 Error probability 1 of user codeword detection based on spherical code superposition NOMA under different power allocation factor(

$ {{\sigma }}_{1}=0.01,{{\sigma }}_{2}=0.03 $

)

图11 不同功率分配因子下球码叠加NOMA的用户码字检测错误概率2（

$ {{\sigma }}_{1}=0.02，{{\sigma }}_{2}=0.06 $

）

Fig.11 Error probability 2 of user codeword detection based on spherical code superposition NOMA under different power allocation factor(

$ {{\sigma }}_{1}=0.02,{{\sigma }}_{2}=0.06 $

)

图12 用户2不同信道估计误差下的球码叠加NOMA的用户码字检测错误概率（

$ {{\sigma }}_{1}=0.01，{{\sigma }}_{2}=0.10 $

）

Fig.12 Error probability of user codeword detection based on spherical code superposition NOMA under different channel estimation errors for user 2(

$ {{\sigma }}_{1}=0.01,{{\sigma }}_{2}=0.10 $

)

图13 用户1不同信道估计误差下的球码叠加NOMA的用户码字检测错误概率（

$ {{\sigma }}_{2}=0.08，{g}=1.10 $

）

Fig.13 Error probability of user codeword detection based on spherical code superposition NOMA under different channel estimation errors of user 1(

$ {{\sigma }}_{2}=0.08,{g}=1.10 $

)

图14 不同信道估计误差下格码叠加NOMA的用户码字检测错误概率

Fig.14 Error probability of user codeword detection based on grid code superposition NOMA under different channel estimation errors

参考文献 26

1	GUEY J C, LIAO P K, CHEN Y S, et al. On 5G radio access architecture and technology. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2015, 22 (5): 2- 5. doi: 10.1109/MWC.2015.7306369
2	高辉, 田野. 5G传送网方案和关键技术研究. 电子世界, 2021, (21): 61- 62. doi: 10.12043/j.issn.1003-0522.2021.21.dzsj202121031
	GAO H, TIAN Y. Research on scheme and key technologies of 5G transport network. Electronics World, 2021, (21): 61- 62. doi: 10.12043/j.issn.1003-0522.2021.21.dzsj202121031
3	黄诚. 5G承载网关键技术和组网方案探讨. 邮电设计技术, 2021, (4): 15- 18. URL
	HUANG C. Discussion on key technologies and networking scheme of 5G bearer network. Designing Techniques of Posts and Telecommunications, 2021, (4): 15- 18. URL
4	WANG P, XIAO J, PING L. Comparison of orthogonal and non-orthogonal approaches to future wireless cellular systems. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 2006, 1 (3): 4- 11. doi: 10.1109/MVT.2006.307294
5	TULLBERG H, POPOVSKI P, LI Z X, et al. The METIS 5G system concept: meeting the 5G requirements. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2016, 54 (12): 132- 139. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2016.1500799CM
6	FU Y R, SHUM K W, SUNG C W, et al. Optimal user pairing in cache-based NOMA systems with index coding[C]//Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications. Washington D. C., USA: IEEE Press, 2019: 1-6.
7	廖晗, 马东亚, 尹礼欣. 基于非正交多址的认知MIMO网络次用户系统容量优化. 计算机应用, 2017, 37 (12): 3361- 3367. doi: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2017.12.3361
	LIAO H, MA D Y, YIN L X. Capacity optimization of secondary user system in MIMO cognitive networks based on non-orthogonal multiple access. Journal of Computer Applications, 2017, 37 (12): 3361- 3367. doi: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2017.12.3361
8	DING Z G, YANG Z, FAN P Z, et al. On the performance of non-orthogonal multiple access in 5G systems with randomly deployed users. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2014, 21 (12): 1501- 1505. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2014.2343971
9	XU P, YUAN Y, DING Z G, et al. On the outage performance of non-orthogonal multiple access with 1-bit feedback. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2016, 15 (10): 6716- 6730. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2016.2587880
10	VAEZI M, SCHOBER R, DING Z G, et al. Non-orthogonal multiple access: common myths and critical questions. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2019, 26 (5): 174- 180. doi: 10.1109/MWC.2019.1800598
11	肖可鑫. 非正交多址接入系统中的编码调制技术研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2019.
	XIAO K X. Research on coded modulation technology for non-orthogonal multiple access systems[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2019. (in Chinese)
12	DAI L L, WANG B C, DING Z G, et al. A survey of non-orthogonal multiple access for 5G. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2018, 20 (3): 2294- 2323.
13	ISLAM S M R, AVAZOV N, DOBRE O A, et al. Power-domain non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) in 5G systems: potentials and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2017, 19 (2): 721- 742.
14	BENJEBBOUR A, SAITO Y, KISHIYAMA Y, et al. Concept and practical considerations of non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) for future radio access[C]//Proceedings of International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems. Washington D. C., USA: IEEE Press, 2014: 770-774.
15	TSE D, VISWANATH P. Fundamentals of wireless communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
16	赵蕊. 非正交多址技术中功分多址的研究[D]. 北京: 北京邮电大学, 2015.
	ZHAO R. Research on power allocation in non-orthogonal multiple access[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2015. (in Chinese)
17	GOLDSMITH A. Wireless communications. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
18	徐兰菊. 球填装和球面上填装问题的研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2006.
	XU L J. Research on the problem of sphere packings and the packing on the surface of a sphere[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2006. (in Chinese)
19	QIU M, HUANG Y C, YUAN J H, et al. Lattice-partition-based downlink non-orthogonal multiple access without SIC for slow fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2019, 67 (2): 1166- 1181. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2018.2878847
20	QIU M, HUANG Y C, SHIEH S L, et al. A lattice-partition framework of downlink non-orthogonal multiple access without SIC[C]//Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference. Washington D. C., IEEE Press, 2018: 1-6.
21	VAMEGHESTAHBANATI M, MARSLAND I D, GOHARY R H, et al. Multidimensional constellations for uplink SCMA systems—a comparative study. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2019, 21 (3): 2169- 2194.
22	SUNG C W, SHUM K W. Lattice-superposition NOMA for near-far users[C]//Proceedings of International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems. Washington D. C., USA: IEEE Press, 2020: 1-12.
23	ZOU J, SUNG C W, SHUM K W. High-dimensional superposition NOMA and its user pairing strategy. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2021, 20 (6): 3800- 3814. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2021.3053622
24	陈发堂, 贾东升, 耿明月. 一种低复杂度的SCMA系统多用户检测算法. 计算机工程, 2018, 44 (6): 40- 44. URL
	CHEN F T, JIA D S, GENG M Y. A multi-user detection algorithm for SCMA system with low complexity. Computer Engineering, 2018, 44 (6): 40- 44. URL
25	SUN J Y, ZOU J, QU J, et al. Four-dimensional modulation superposition NOMA scheme with non-ideal channel estimation[C]//Proceedings of IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China. Washington D. C., USA: IEEE Press, 2020: 172-177.
26	CHERNOFF H. A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1952, 23 (4): 493- 507. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729330

[1]	宋勇春, 王茜竹, 高正念. 基于HAGA的D2D-NOMA资源分配优化算法[J]. 计算机工程, 2022, 48(2): 275-280,290.
[2]	方海涛, 李明齐, 卞鑫. 基于DFT寻径的压缩感知信道估计改进算法[J]. 计算机工程, 2022, 48(1): 182-187.
[3]	周烁, 仇润鹤. 不完全SIC下CR-NOMA系统的功率分配算法[J]. 计算机工程, 2021, 47(8): 195-200,209.
[4]	郑娟毅, 崔卓, 苏海龙, 殷帅帅, 刘遥遥. 基于改进GA-Elman的无线智能传播损耗预测方法[J]. 计算机工程, 2021, 47(7): 155-160,167.
[5]	余钊贤, 易辉跃, 裴俊. 5G超密集异构网络带内无线回传资源分配方案[J]. 计算机工程, 2021, 47(3): 43-52.
[6]	龙恳, 李伟, 鲁江丽, 蒋明均, 隆泉. 基于匹配理论的NOMA异构网络资源分配算法[J]. 计算机工程, 2021, 47(1): 165-171.
[7]	奚晨婧, 高媛媛, 沙楠. 信道估计误差对物理层安全加密方案的影响[J]. 计算机工程, 2020, 46(6): 122-129.
[8]	何尔利, 纪澎善, 贾向东, 牛春雨. 位置协助的无人机毫米波通信网络自适应信道估计[J]. 计算机工程, 2020, 46(6): 196-201.
[9]	方承志, 程宥铖, 火兴龙. 基于MLS的NB-IoT系统下行信道估计算法[J]. 计算机工程, 2020, 46(2): 183-186.
[10]	施钊, 孙长印, 江帆. 毫米波网络中基于Q-Learning的阻塞感知功率分配[J]. 计算机工程, 2020, 46(12): 185-192.
[11]	吕亚平, 贾向东, 路艺, 叶佩文. 基于深度学习的家庭基站下行链路功率分配[J]. 计算机工程, 2020, 46(10): 188-192.
[12]	彭大芹, 孙向月, 王付龙. Femto网络中基于自适应定价的功率控制算法[J]. 计算机工程, 2019, 45(9): 100-104.
[13]	龙恳, 陈德建, 吴芳炜. 基于用户序列相位旋转的非正交多址接入方案[J]. 计算机工程, 2019, 45(9): 49-54.
[14]	龙向阳, 姚建国. 用于大规模MIMO系统的SAGE迭代信道估计算法[J]. 计算机工程, 2019, 45(8): 141-145.
[15]	徐琳,赵知劲. 基于分布式协作Q学习的信道与功率分配算法[J]. 计算机工程, 2019, 45(6): 160-164,174.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容