区块链混币监管技术研究综述

doi:10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0070189

计算机工程 ›› 2026, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (7): 22-39. doi: 10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0070189

区块链混币监管技术研究综述

王佳鑫¹, 毛谦昂¹, 颜嘉麒¹^,*(), 印杰², 何源³, 张祎⁴

1. 南京大学信息管理学院, 江苏南京 210023
2. 江苏警官学院计算机信息与网络安全系, 江苏南京 210031
3. 常州市公安局, 江苏常州 213000
4. 江苏省公安厅, 江苏南京 210000

收稿日期:2024-08-04 修回日期:2024-12-09 出版日期:2026-07-15 发布日期:2025-01-20
通讯作者: 颜嘉麒
作者简介:
王佳鑫(CCF学生会员), 男, 博士研究生, 主研方向为区块链监管
毛谦昂(CCF学生会员), 博士研究生
颜嘉麒(CCF会员、通信作者), 教授、博士
印杰(CCF会员), 高级工程师
何源, 硕士
张祎, 硕士
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(72571131); 国家自然科学基金(72171115)

Review of Blockchain-based Coin Mixing Regulatory Technology

WANG Jiaxin¹, MAO Qian'ang¹, YAN Jiaqi¹^,*(), YIN Jie², HE Yuan³, ZHANG Yi⁴

1. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China
2. Department of Computer Information and Network Security, Jiangsu Police Institute, Nanjing 210031, Jiangsu, China
3. Changzhou Public Security Bureau, Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu, China
4. Jiangsu Provincial Public Security Department, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China

Received:2024-08-04 Revised:2024-12-09 Online:2026-07-15 Published:2025-01-20
Contact: YAN Jiaqi

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

区块链技术的迅速发展与加密货币的兴起不仅挑战了传统的金融和资产管理观念, 也带来了一系列隐私与安全方面的问题。加密货币混币技术作为区块链隐私保护的主要手段, 旨在提升交易的匿名性并保障用户身份的隐私。然而, 这种增强的匿名性也使得加密货币成为洗钱、盗窃、欺诈等犯罪活动的工具。因此, 亟须全面审视加密货币混币服务的识别、检测与监管技术的研究, 以支持执法机构并促进加密货币的安全合规。首先系统梳理了混币服务的技术原理与机制分类, 设计了一套通用的混币工具分类体系, 详细探讨了混币服务可能引发的犯罪活动; 接着重点讨论了基于人工规则、地址聚类、实体分类、异常交易检测和混币服务追溯5种混币监管技术的最新学术研究进展, 并总结了现有工业界中与混币监管相关的工具和平台; 最后提出了混币监管目前所面临的挑战, 为未来的研究方向提供展望。

关键词: 区块链, 加密货币, 混币, 隐私保护, 监管技术

Abstract:

The rapid development of blockchain technology and the rise of cryptocurrencies not only challenge traditional financial and asset management concepts but also introduce significant privacy and security concerns. Coin mixing, a primary privacy protection mechanism in blockchains, is designed to enhance transaction anonymity and protect user identities. However, this enhanced anonymity also enables the misuse of cryptocurrencies for illicit activities such as money laundering, theft, and fraud. Therefore, a comprehensive review of technologies for the identification, detection, and regulation of coin mixing services is urgently required to support law enforcement and promote the secure and compliant use of cryptocurrencies. This paper first reviews the technical principles and mechanisms of coin mixing services and proposes a general classification framework for mixing tools while discussing the criminal activities associated with them. Subsequently, it focuses on recent advances in five key regulatory approaches: manual rule-based methods, address clustering, entity classification, anomalous transaction detection, and mixing service traceability. It also surveys existing industrial tools and platforms related to coin mixing regulations. Finally, it identifies current challenges in the field and suggests directions for future research.

Key words: blockchain, cryptocurrency, coin mixing, privacy protection, regulatory technology

王佳鑫, 毛谦昂, 颜嘉麒, 印杰, 何源, 张祎. 区块链混币监管技术研究综述[J]. 计算机工程, 2026, 52(7): 22-39.

WANG Jiaxin, MAO Qian'ang, YAN Jiaqi, YIN Jie, HE Yuan, ZHANG Yi. Review of Blockchain-based Coin Mixing Regulatory Technology[J]. Computer Engineering, 2026, 52(7): 22-39.

https://www.ecice06.com/CN/Y2026/V52/I7/22

图/表 8

图1 中心化混币服务和去中心化混币服务

Fig.1 Centralized and decentralized coin mixing services

图2 多输入和找零地址启发式的地址聚类原理图

Fig.2 Schematic diagram of multiple input and change address heuristic address clustering

图3 污点资金流转示例

Fig.3 Examples of tainted fund circulation

参考文献 131

1	倪雪莉, 马卓, 王群. 区块链矿池网络及典型攻击方式综述. 计算机工程, 2024, 50 (1): 17- 29. doi: 10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0068203
	NI X L , MA Z , WANG Q . Overview of blockchain mining pool networks and typical attack modes. Computer Engineering, 2024, 50 (1): 17- 29. doi: 10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0068203
2	刘敖迪, 杜学绘, 王娜, 等. 区块链技术及其在信息安全领域的研究进展. 软件学报, 2018, 29 (7): 2092- 2115.
	LIU A D , DU X H , WANG N , et al. Research progress of blockchain technology and its application in information security. Journal of Software, 2018, 29 (7): 2092- 2115.
3	李旭东, 牛玉坤, 魏凌波, 等. 比特币隐私保护综述. 密码学报, 2019, 6 (2): 133- 149.
	LI X D , NIU Y K , WEI L B , et al. Overview on privacy protection in Bitcoin. Journal of Cryptologic Reseatch, 2019, 6 (2): 133- 149.
4	SEE K . The Satoshi laundromat: a review on the money laundering open door of Bitcoin mixers. Journal of Financial Crime, 2024, 31 (2): 416- 426. doi: 10.1108/JFC-11-2022-0269
5	CHAWKI M. Cybercrime and the regulation of cryptocurrencies[M]//ARAI K. Advances in information and communication. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing, 2022: 694-713.
6	CRAWFORD J, GUAN Y. Knowing your Bitcoin customer: money laundering in the Bitcoin economy[C]//Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering (SADFE). Washington D.C., USA: IEEE Press, 2020: 38-45.
7	PAKKI J, SHOSHITAISHVILI Y, WANG R Y, et al. Everything you ever wanted to know about Bitcoin mixers (but were afraid to ask)[M]// BORISOV N, DIAZ C. Financial cryptography and data security. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2021: 117-146.
8	宋靖文, 张大伟, 韩旭, 等. 区块链中可监管的身份隐私保护方案. 软件学报, 2023, 34 (7): 3292- 3312. doi: 10.13328/j.cnki.jos.006517
	SONG J W , ZHANG D W , HAN X , et al. Supervised identity privacy protection scheme in blockchain. Journal of Software, 2023, 34 (7): 3292- 3312. doi: 10.13328/j.cnki.jos.006517
9	赵楷, 胡煜环, 闫俊桥, 等. 基于区块链的版权保护研究综述. 计算机工程, 2025, 51 (8): 1- 15. doi: 10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0069147
	ZHAO K , HU Y H , YAN J Q , et al. Overview of copyright protection research based on blockchain. Computer Engineering, 2025, 51 (8): 1- 15. doi: 10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0069147
10	祝烈煌, 高峰, 沈蒙, 等. 区块链隐私保护研究综述. 计算机研究与发展, 2017, 54 (10): 2170- 2186.
	ZHU L H , GAO F , SHEN M , et al. Survey on privacy preserving techniques for blockchain technology. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2017, 54 (10): 2170- 2186.
11	FENG Q , HE D B , ZEADALLY S , et al. A survey on privacy protection in blockchain system. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2019, 126, 45- 58. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2018.10.020
12	WANG D , ZHAO J D , WANG Y J . A survey on privacy protection of blockchain: the technology and application. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 108766- 108781. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2994294
13	PENG L , FENG W , YAN Z , et al. Privacy preservation in permissionless blockchain: a survey. Digital Communications and Networks, 2021, 7 (3): 295- 307. doi: 10.1016/j.dcan.2020.05.008
14	王佳鑫, 颜嘉麒, 毛谦昂. 加密数字货币监管技术研究综述. 计算机应用, 2023, 43 (10): 2983- 2995.
	WANG J X , YAN J Q , MAO Q A . Overview of cryptocurrency regulatory technologies research. Journal of Computer Applications, 2023, 43 (10): 2983- 2995.
15	陈伟利, 郑子彬. 区块链数据分析: 现状、趋势与挑战. 计算机研究与发展, 2018 (9): 1853- 1870. doi: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.2018.20180127
	CHEN W L , ZHENG Z B . Blockchain data analysis: a review of status, trends and challenges. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2018 (9): 1853- 1870. doi: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.2018.20180127
16	HOU W H, CUI B, LI R. A survey on blockchain data analysis[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE 45th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC). Washington D.C., USA: IEEE Press, 2021: 357-365.
17	YADAV S P , AGRAWAL K K , BHATI B S , et al. Blockchain-based cryptocurrency regulation: an overview. Computational Economics, 2022, 59 (4): 1659- 1675. doi: 10.1007/s10614-020-10050-0
18	WU J J , LIU J L , ZHAO Y J , et al. Analysis of cryptocurrency transactions from a network perspective: an overview. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2021, 190, 103139. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103139
19	ZIEGELDORF J H , MATZUTT R , HENZE M , et al. Secure and anonymous decentralized Bitcoin mixing. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2018, 80, 448- 466. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2016.05.018
20	BitMix. Biz[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://bitmiix.biz/.
21	Blender. io[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://blender.io.
22	JoinMarket[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://github.com/JoinMarket-Org/joinmarket-clientserver.
23	MAURER F K, NEUDECKER T, FLORIAN M. Anonymous CoinJoin transactions with arbitrary values[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS. Washington D.C., USA: IEEE Press, 2017: 522-529.
24	Wasabi Wallet[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://wasabiwallet.io/.
25	Samourai Wallet[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://samouraiwallet.com/.
26	HOUY S , SCHMID P , BARTEL A . Security aspects of cryptocurrency wallets—a systematic literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 2024, 56 (1): 1- 31.
27	LIU J K. Ring signature[M]//LI K C, CHEN X, SUSILO W. Advances in cyber security: principles, techniques, and applications. Singapore: Springer, 2018: 93-114.
28	CAO T, YU J S, DECOUCHANT J, et al. Exploring the Monero peer-to-peer network[M]//BONNEAU J, HENINGER N. Financial cryptography and data security. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2020: 578-594.
29	SUN S F, AU M H, LIU J K, et al. RingCT 2.0: a compact accumulator-based (linkable ring signature) protocol for blockchain cryptocurrency monero[C]//Proceedings of ESORICS'17. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2017: 456-474.
30	LI Y N , YANG G M , SUSILO W , et al. Traceable monero: anonymous cryptocurrency with enhanced accountability. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2021, 18 (2): 679- 691. doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2019.2910058
31	SUN X Q , YU F R , ZHANG P , et al. A survey on zero-knowledge proof in blockchain. IEEE Network, 2021, 35 (4): 198- 205. doi: 10.1109/MNET.011.2000473
32	KAPPOS G, YOUSAF H, MALLER M, et al. An empirical analysis of anonymity in Zcash[C]//Proceedings of the 27th USENIX Security Symposium. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2018: 463-477.
33	YOUN M, CHIN K, OMOTE K. Empirical analysis of cryptocurrency mixer: Tornado Cash[C]//Proceedings of the Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Applied Computing (CSCE). Washington D.C., USA: IEEE Press, 2024: 2324-2331.
34	OU W , HUANG S Y , ZHENG J J , et al. An overview on cross-chain: mechanism, platforms, challenges and advances. Computer Networks, 2022, 218, 109378. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109378
35	ShapeShift[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://app.shapeshift.com.
36	changenow. io[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://changenow.io/.
37	陈艳姣, 朱笑天, 于永瑞, 等. 区块链闪电网络实证分析: 拓扑、发展和收费策略. 软件学报, 2022, 33 (10): 3858- 3873. doi: 10.13328/j.cnki.jos.006380
	CHEN Y J , ZHU X T , YU Y R , et al. Empirical analysis of lightning network: topology, evolution, and fees. Journal of Software, 2022, 33 (10): 3858- 3873. doi: 10.13328/j.cnki.jos.006380
38	DIVAKARUNI A , ZIMMERMAN P . The lightning network: turning Bitcoin into money. Finance Research Letters, 2023, 52, 103480. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103480
39	ALSABAH M , GOLDBERG I . Performance and security improvements for tor: a survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 2017, 49 (2): 1- 36.
40	DASGUPTA D , SHREIN J M , GUPTA K D . A survey of blockchain from security perspective. Journal of Banking and Financial Technology, 2019, 3 (1): 1- 17. doi: 10.1007/s42786-018-00002-6
41	RAIKWAR M, GLIGOROSKI D. DoS attacks on blockchain ecosystem[C]//Proceedings of Parallel Processing Workshops. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2022: 230-242.
42	HEILMAN E, ALSHENIBR L, BALDIMTSI F, et al. TumbleBit: an untrusted Bitcoin-compatible anonymous payment hub[C]//Proceedings of 2017 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. San Diego, USA: Internet Society, 2017: 1-12.
43	BARAVALLE A, LEE S W. Dark Web markets: turning the lights on AlphaBay[C]//Proceedings of WISE'18. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2018: 502-514.
44	Bitcoin Fog[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://bitcoinfog.info/.
45	CoinMixer[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://coinmixer.app/index.htm.
46	BestMixer[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://bestmixer.io.
47	CryptoMixer[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://cryptomixer.io.
48	BONNEAU J, NARAYANAN A, MILLER A, et al. MixCoin: anonymity for Bitcoin with accountable mixes[M]//CHRISTIN N, SAFAVI-NAINI R. Financial cryptography and data security. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2014: 486-504.
49	BitLaundry[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://bitcoinlaundry.net/.
50	MixTum[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://mixtum.io/.
51	BitLaunder[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://whir.to/?ref=rs1aalji.
52	VALENTA L, ROWAN B. BlindCoin: blinded, accountable mixes for Bitcoin[M]//BRENNER M, CHRISTIN N, JOHNSON B, et al. Financial cryptography and data security. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2015: 112-126.
53	IBRAHIM M H . SecureCoin: a robust secure and efficient protocol for anonymous Bitcoin ecosystem. International Journal of Network Security, 2017, 19 (2): 295- 312.
54	BISSIAS G, OZISIK A P, LEVINE B N, et al. Sybil-resistant mixing for Bitcoin[C]//Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2014: 149-158.
55	ChipMixer[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://chipmixer.com.
56	Tornado Cash[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://tornadoeth.cash/.
57	ZIEGELDORF J H, GROSSMANN F, HENZE M, et al. CoinParty: secure multi-party mixing of Bitcoins[C]//Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2015: 75-86.
58	CoinJoin[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://coinjoin.io.
59	RUFFING T, MORENO-SANCHEZ P, KATE A. CoinShuffle: practical decentralized coin mixing for Bitcoin[C]//Proceedings of ESORICS'14. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2014: 345-364.
60	Chainalysis-crypto-crime-2024[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://go.chainalysis.com/crypto-crime-2024.html.
61	Indictment charges two in $230 million cryptocurrency scam[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/indictment-charges-two-230-million-cryptocurrency-scam.
62	Individual arrested and charged with operating notorious darknet cryptocurrency "Mixer"[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/individual-arrested-and-charged-operating-notorious-darknet-cryptocurrency-mixer.
63	Ohio resident pleads guilty to operating darknet-based Bitcoin 'Mixer' that laundered over $300 million[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ohio-resident-pleads-guilty-operating-darknet-based-bitcoin-mixer-laundered-over-300-million.
64	U.S. treasury issues first-ever sanctions on a virtual currency mixer, targets dprk cyber threats[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0768.
65	U.S. treasury sanctions notorious virtual currency mixer tornado cash[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0916.
66	Justice department investigation leads to takedown of darknet cryptocurrency mixer that processed over $3 billion of unlawful transactions[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-investigation-leads-takedown-darknet-cryptocurrency-mixer-processed-over-3.
67	U.S. sanctions crypto mixer sinbad. io for role in North Korean laundering activities[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/crypto-mixer-sinbad-sactioned-north-korean-laundering/.
68	Bitcoin Fog operator convicted of money laundering conspiracy[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/bitcoin-fog-operator-convicted-money-laundering-conspiracy.
69	Founders and CEO of cryptocurrency mixing service arrested and charged with money laundering and unlicensed money transmitting offenses[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/founders-and-ceo-cryptocurrency-mixing-service-arrested-and-charged-money-laundering.
70	HOLT T J , LEE J R , GRIFFITH E . An assessment of cryptomixing services in online illicit markets. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 2023, 39 (2): 222- 238. doi: 10.1177/10439862231158004
71	MÖSER M, BÖHME R, BREUKER D. An inquiry into money laundering tools in the Bitcoin ecosystem[C]//Proceedings of the APWG eCrime Researchers Summit. Washington D.C., USA: IEEE Press, 2014: 1-14.
72	DE BALTHASAR T, HERNANDEZ-CASTRO J. An analysis of Bitcoin laundry services[M]//LIPMAA H, MITROKOTSA A, MATULEVI AČG IUS R. Secure IT systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2017: 297-312.
73	MIEDEMA F, LUBBERTSEN K, SCHRAMA V, et al. Mixed signals: analyzing ground-truth data on the users and economics of a Bitcoin mixing service[C]//Proceedings of the 32nd USENIX Security Symposium. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2023: 751-768.
74	STOCKINGER J . Analysis of decentralized mixing services in the greater Bitcoin ecosystem. The Journal of the British Blockchain Association, 2020, 3 (2): 1- 15.
75	SCHNOERING H, VAZIRGIANNIS M. Heuristics for detecting CoinJoin transactions on the Bitcoin blockchain[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12491.
76	CONTI M , GANGWAL A , RUJ S . On the economic significance of ransomware campaigns: a Bitcoin transactions perspective. Computers & Security, 2018, 79, 162- 189.
77	MAKSUTOV A A, ALEXEEV M S, FEDOROVA N O, et al. Detection of blockchain transactions used in blockchain mixer of coin join type[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus). Washington D.C., USA: IEEE Press, 2019: 274-277.
78	TIRONSAKKUL T, MAAREK M, EROSS A, et al. The unique dressing of transactions: Wasabi CoinJoin transaction detection[C]//Proccedings of the European Interdisciplinary Cybersecurity Conference. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2022: 21-28.
79	SHOJAEENASAB A, MOTAMED A P, BAHRAK B. Mixing detection on Bitcoin transactions using statistical patterns[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.02019.
80	李虎, 陈云芳, 张伟. 基于CoinJoin实现的混币交易检测方法——以Wasabi平台为例. 网络与信息安全学报, 2023, 9 (6): 140- 153.
	LI H , CHEN Y F , ZHANG W . Detection method of mixed coin transaction based on CoinJoin—take the Wasabi platform as an example. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9 (6): 140- 153.
81	HONG Y, KWON H, LEE J, et al. A practical de-mixing algorithm for Bitcoin mixing services[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Blockchains, Cryptocurrencies, and Contracts. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2018: 15-20.
82	TANG Y J, XU C, ZHANG C, et al. Analysis of address linkability in tornado cash on Ethereum[M]//LU W, ZHANG Y, WEN W, et al. Communication in computer and information science. Singapore: Springer, 2022: 39-50.
83	WU M K, MCTIGHE W, WANG K L, et al. Tutela: an open-source tool for assessing user-privacy on Ethereum and tornado cash[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.06811.
84	WU L, HU Y F, ZHOU Y J, et al. Towards understanding and demystifying Bitcoin mixing services[C]//Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2021: 33-44.
85	HONG Y, KWON H, LEE S, et al. Poster: de-mixing Bitcoin mixing services[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Blockchains, Cryptocurrencies, and Contracts. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2018: 15-20.
86	YOUSAF H, KAPPOS G, MEIKLEJOHN S. Tracing transactions across cryptocurrency ledgers[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.12786.
87	BÉRES F, SERES I A, BENCZÚR A A, et al. Blockchain is watching you: profiling and deanonymizing Ethereum users[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Decentralized Applications and Infrastructures (DAPPS). Washington D.C., USA: IEEE Press, 2021: 69-78.
88	MEIKLEJOHN S, POMAROLE M, JORDAN G, et al. A fistful of Bitcoins: characterizing payments among men with no names[C]//Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2013: 127-140.
89	SQUAREPANTS S. Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3440802.
90	ANDROULAKI E, KARAME G O, ROESCHLIN M, et al. Evaluating user privacy in Bitcoin[M]// SADEGHI A R. Financial cryptography and data security. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2013: 34-51.
91	REID F, HARRIGAN M. An analysis of anonymity in the Bitcoin system[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing. Washington D.C., USA: IEEE Press, 2012: 1318-1326.
92	ZHANG Y H , WANG J , LUO J . Heuristic-based address clustering in Bitcoin. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 210582- 210591. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3039570
93	HE X , HE K T , LIN S W , et al. Bitcoin address clustering method based on multiple heuristic conditions. IET Blockchain, 2022, 2 (2): 44- 56. doi: 10.1049/blc2.12014
94	LIU F , LI Z H , JIA K , et al. Bitcoin address clustering based on change address improvement. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2024, 11 (6): 8094- 8105. doi: 10.1109/TCSS.2023.3239031
95	VICTOR F. Address clustering heuristics for Ethereum[M]//BONNEAU J, HENINGER N. Financial cryptography and data security. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2020: 617-633.
96	WAHRSTÄTTER A , GOMES J , KHAN S , et al. Improving cryptocurrency crime detection: CoinJoin community detection approach. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2023, 20 (6): 4946- 4956. doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2023.3238412
97	WAHRSTÄTTER A , TAUDES A , SVETINOVIC D . Reducing privacy of CoinJoin transactions: quantitative Bitcoin network analysis. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2024, 21 (5): 4543- 4558. doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2024.3353803
98	REMY C, RYM B, MATTHIEU L. Tracking Bitcoin users activity using community detection on a network of weak signals[M]//CHERIFI C, CHERIFI H, KARSAI M, et al. Complex networks & their applications VI. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2017: 166-177.
99	SUN H Y, RUAN N, LIU H Q. Ethereum analysis via node clustering[M]//LIU J K, HUANG X. Network and system security. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2019: 114-129.
100	王大宇, 殷婷婷, 李赟, 等. BATscope: 比特币恶意地址及混币交易识别. 信息安全学报, 2023, 8 (4): 1- 16. doi: 10.19363/J.cnki.cn10-1380/tn.2023.07.01
	WANG D Y , YIN T T , LI Y , et al. BATscope: identification of Bitcoin malicious addresses and mixing transactions. Journal of Information Security Research, 2023, 8 (4): 1- 16. doi: 10.19363/J.cnki.cn10-1380/tn.2023.07.01
101	XU C , XIONG R T , SHEN X D , et al. How to find a Bitcoin mixer: a dual ensemble model for Bitcoin mixing service detection. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2023, 10 (19): 17220- 17230. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3275158
102	PRADO-ROMERO M A, DOERR C, GAGO-ALONSO A. Discovering Bitcoin mixing using anomaly detection[M]//MENDOZA M, VELASTÍN S. Progress in pattern recognition, image analysis, computer vision, and applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2018: 534-541.
103	WU J J , LIU J L , CHEN W L , et al. Detecting mixing services via mining Bitcoin transaction network with hybrid motifs. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2022, 52 (4): 2237- 2249. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2021.3049278
104	RATHORE M M, CHAURASIA S, SHUKLA D. Mixers detection in Bitcoin network: a step towards detecting money laundering in crypto-currencies[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data. Washington D.C., USA: IEEE Press, 2023: 5775-5782.
105	LIU M D , CHEN H , YAN J Q . Detecting roles of money laundering in Bitcoin mixing transactions: a goal modeling and mining framework. Frontiers in Physics, 2021, 9, 665399. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2021.665399
106	DU H B , CHE Z , SHEN M , et al. Breaking the anonymity of Ethereum mixing services using graph feature learning. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2024, 19, 616- 631. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2023.3326984
107	STVTZ R, STOCKINGER J, MORENO-SANCHEZ P, et al. Adoption and actual privacy of decentralized CoinJoin implementations in Bitcoin[C]//Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2022: 254-267.
108	NAN L H, TAO D C. Bitcoin mixing detection using deep autoencoder[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace (DSC). Washington D.C., USA: IEEE Press, 2018: 280-287.
109	SUN X W , YANG T , HU B . LSTM-TC: Bitcoin coin mixing detection method with a high recall. Applied Intelligence, 2022, 52 (1): 780- 793. doi: 10.1007/s10489-021-02453-9
110	YANG H Z, LI Z Z, GOU G P, et al. Bitcoin mixing service detection based on spatio-temporal information representation of transaction graph[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference (IPCCC). Washington D.C., USA: IEEE Press, 2023: 210-219.
111	YU L, ZHANG F J, MA J J, et al. Who are the money launderers? Money laundering detection on blockchain via mutual learning-based graph neural network[C]//Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). Washington D.C., USA: IEEE Press, 2023: 1-8.
112	LO W W , KULATILLEKE G K , SARHAN M , et al. Inspection-L: self-supervised GNN node embeddings for money laundering detection in Bitcoin. Applied Intelligence, 2023, 53 (16): 19406- 19417. doi: 10.1007/s10489-023-04504-9
113	ALARAB I, PRAKOONWIT S, NACER M I. Comparative analysis using supervised learning methods for anti-money laundering in Bitcoin[C]//Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Machine Learning Technologies. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2020: 11-17.
114	HYUN W, LEE J, SUH B. Anti-money laundering in cryptocurrency via multi-relational graph neural network[C]//Proceedings of Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2023: 118-130.
115	LORENZ J, SILVA M I, APARÍCIO D, et al. Machine learning methods to detect money laundering in the Bitcoin blockchain in the presence of label scarcity[C]//Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on AI in Finance. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2020: 1-8.
116	VASSALLO D , VELLA V , ELLUL J . Application of gradient boosting algorithms for anti-money laundering in cryptocurrencies. SN Computer Science, 2021, 2 (3): 143. doi: 10.1007/s42979-021-00558-z
117	TIRONSAKKUL T, MAAREK M, EROSS A, et al. Tracking mixed Bitcoins[M]//GARCIA-ALFARO J, NAVARRO-ARRIBAS G, HERRERA-JOANCOMARTI J. Data privacy management, cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2020: 447-457.
118	TIRONSAKKUL T , MAAREK M , EROSS A , et al. Context matters: methods for Bitcoin tracking. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 2022, 42, 301475.
119	WU J J , LIN D , FU Q S , et al. Toward understanding asset flows in crypto money laundering through the lenses of Ethereum heists. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2024, 19, 1994- 2009. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2023.3346276
120	WU Z Y , LIU J L , WU J J , et al. TRacer: scalable graph-based transaction tracing for account-based blockchain trading systems. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2023, 18, 2609- 2621. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2023.3266162
121	ZHANG Z Y , YIN J Y , HU B , et al. CLTracer: a cross-ledger tracing framework based on address relationships. Computers & Security, 2022, 113, 102558.
122	Chainanalysis Reactor[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://app.chainalysis.com/login?redirect=reactor.
123	Chainalysis Know Your Transaction (KYT)[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://www.chainalysis.com/chainalysis-kyt-certification/.
124	Clain Probe[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://clain.io/products/probe.
125	Elliptic crypto-wallet-monitoring[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://www.elliptic.co/crypto-wallet-monitoring-screening-software.
126	MistTrack[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://misttrack.io/.
127	CipherTrace[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://home.ciphertrace.com/.
128	Crystal Blockchain[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://crystalintelligence.com/.
129	Scorechain[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://www.scorechain.com/.
130	TRM Labs[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://www.trmlabs.com/.
131	QLUE[EB/OL]. [2024-07-18]. https://blockchaingroup.io/qlue/.

[1]	汪雅琪, 王明文. 结合生成和嵌入网络的人脸隐私保护识别[J]. 计算机工程, 2026, 52(7): 265-276.
[2]	陈中, 李晓风, 赵赫, 张凌浩. 基于数据可用性采样与智能合约的去中心化存储方法[J]. 计算机工程, 2026, 52(6): 189-201.
[3]	曹天涯, 张宇帆, 贾俊杰. 一种有效提高数据可用性的联邦学习隐私保护算法[J]. 计算机工程, 2026, 52(6): 249-257.
[4]	李江涛, 马礼, 李阳. 基于大小模型融合的医疗数据分类方法[J]. 计算机工程, 2026, 52(5): 360-370.
[5]	李亮, 肖名志, 陈曦. 区块链技术的去中心化新闻检索与聚合架构研究[J]. 计算机工程, 2026, 52(5): 303-325.
[6]	赵楷, 闫俊桥, 胡煜环, 毕雪华, 张琳琳. 基于多链协同的医疗集采数据监管方案[J]. 计算机工程, 2026, 52(4): 409-423.
[7]	高改梅, 邸国霞, 刘春霞, 杨玉丽, 党伟超, 张爱贞. 基于全同态加密的区块链电子投票方案[J]. 计算机工程, 2026, 52(4): 313-326.
[8]	朱炳丞, 周凤, 田有亮, 向阿新, 熊伟, 彭长根. 基于SM2算法的无证书多重签名及其在区块链交易中的应用[J]. 计算机工程, 2026, 52(4): 290-301.
[9]	周岳霖, 钟伯成, 王瑞. 基于区块链的轻量级车载自组网条件隐私保护认证[J]. 计算机工程, 2026, 52(3): 201-210.
[10]	曹天涯, 张雨静, 贾俊杰, 张宇帆, 邓晓飞. 基于个性化梯度裁剪的联邦学习隐私保护算法[J]. 计算机工程, 2026, 52(2): 265-274.
[11]	林丹, 卢顺峰, 刘姿妍, 张博昭, 何龙, 蒋子规, 吴嘉婧, 郑子彬. 大语言模型赋能区块链服务安全研究综述: 现状、挑战与机遇(特邀)[J]. 计算机工程, 2026, 52(1): 1-21.
[12]	申振龙, 童燕翔, 王萧, 王奔, 张鹏程. 基于BERT模型的跨链异常交易检测[J]. 计算机工程, 2026, 52(1): 254-265.
[13]	徐瀅, 傅紫薇, 张伟, 陈云芳. 基于抽象语法树嵌入的智能合约漏洞检测技术[J]. 计算机工程, 2025, 51(9): 149-157.
[14]	毕昌兵, 田有亮. 车联网中基于身份签名的匿名可追溯消息认证方案[J]. 计算机工程, 2025, 51(9): 158-165.
[15]	王群, 李馥娟, 马卓. 区块链在BGP路由泄露防护中的应用研究[J]. 计算机工程, 2025, 51(8): 39-52.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

区块链混币监管技术研究综述

Review of Blockchain-based Coin Mixing Regulatory Technology

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 131

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

区块链混币监管技术研究综述

Review of Blockchain-based Coin Mixing Regulatory Technology

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 131

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价