Research Review of Knowledge Graph Construction Technology

doi:10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0252971

Abstract

Abstract: 】Knowledge graphs, as a structured semantic knowledge representation with entities as nodes and relationships as edges, can accurately depict various things in the real world and their complex associations, and have become a core supporting technology across multiple domains, including artificial intelligence, natural language processing, recommendation systems, and intelligent question-answering, providing an important foundation for machines to understand semantics and achieve cognitive intelligence. First, this paper expounds the basic concepts and system architecture of the knowledge graph, clarifies the knowledge representation unit with the “entity-relationship-attribute” triple as the core, and analyzes the applicable scenarios and technical characteristics of both top-down and bottom-up construction approaches. Secondly, this paper focuses on analyzing the technical evolution of three core links in the knowledge graph construction process, namely information extraction, knowledge fusion, and knowledge reasoning, systematically combs the technical development context, and compares the advantages and limitations of different methods. Thirdly, through in-depth analysis of the differences in technical route selection between DBpedia and Baidu two typical knowledge graph, the theoretical method is combined with the actual knowledge graph construction scenario. Finally, the challenges faced by the current knowledge graph construction in terms of data quality, semantic consistency, and dynamic evolution are summarized, and future research directions are looked forward, aiming to provide comprehensive guidance for both theoretical research and practical applications in knowledge graph construction, thereby advancing technological development in this field.

摘要： 武警工程大学密码工程学院，陕西西安 710086；2. 网络与信息安全保密武警部队重点实验室，陕西西安 710086）摘要：知识图谱作为一种以实体为节点、关系为边的结构化语义知识表示形式，能够精准刻画现实世界中各类事物及其复杂关联，已成为人工智能、自然语言处理、推荐系统、智能问答等多个领域的核心支撑技术，为机器理解语义和实现认知智能提供了重要基础。首先，阐述知识图谱的基本概念与体系架构，明确以“实体-关系-属性”三元组为核心的知识表示单元，并分别剖析自顶向下和自底向上两种构建模式的适用场景与技术特点；其次，重点分析知识图谱构建过程中信息抽取、知识融合以及知识推理三大核心环节的技术演进，系统梳理了技术发展脉络，并对比不同方法的优势与局限；再次，通过深入剖析DBpedia 和百度两个典型知识图谱在技术路线选择上的差异，将理论方法与实际知识图谱构建场景相结合；最后，总结当前知识图谱构建在数据质量、语义一致性、动态演化等方面面临的挑战，并展望未来研究方向，旨在为知识图谱构建的理论研究与实际应用提供全面参考，推动该领域技术的进一步发展。

ZHAO Yingying, ZHU Shuaishuai. Research Review of Knowledge Graph Construction Technology[J]. Computer Engineering, doi: 10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0252971.

赵莹莹, 朱率率. 知识图谱构建技术研究综述[J]. 计算机工程, doi: 10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0252971.

/ Recommend / Download Citations

URL: https://www.ecice06.com/EN/10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0252971

References

[1] SINGHAL A. Introducing the knowledge graph: things, not strings [EB/OL]. [2021-11-19]. https://blog.google/products/search/introducing-knowledge-graph -things-not/.
[2] WIKIPEDIA. Knowledge graph [EB/OL]. [2016-05-09]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Graph. [3] 徐增林, 盛泳潘, 贺丽荣, 等. 知识图谱技术综述[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2016, 45(4): 589-606.
XU Z L, SHENG Y P, HE L R, et al. Review on knowledge graph techniques[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2016, 45(4): 589-606. (in Chinese)
[4] DONG X, GABRILOVICH E, HEITZ G, et al. Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion[C]//Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New
York, USA: ACM Press, 2014: 601-610. [5] HOBBS J R, APPELT D, BEAR J, et al. Fastus: a system for extracting information from natural-language text[C]//Proceedings of the 4th Message Understanding Conference. Washington D.C., USA: IEEE Press, 1992: 29-32.
[6] KIM J H, WOODLAND P C. A rule-based named entity recognition system for speech input[C]//Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Beijing, China: ISCA, 2000: 528‑531.
[7] LIU X H, ZHANG S D, WEI F R, et al. Recognizing named entities in tweets[C]//Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Stroudsburg, USA: ACL, 2011: 359-367.
[8] 何炎祥, 罗楚威, 胡彬尧. 基于CRF和规则相结合的地理命名实体识别方法[J]. 计算机应用与软件, 2015, 32(1): 179-185, 202. HE Y X, LUO C W, HU B Y. Geographic entity recognition method based on CRF model and rules combination[J]. Computer Applications and Software, 2015, 32(1): 179-185, 202. (in Chinese)
[9] LAMPLE G, BALLESTEROS M, SUBRAMANIAN S, et al. Neural architectures for named entity recognition.[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. San Diego, USA: ACL, 2016:260-270.
[10] DONG X S, QIAN L J, GUAN Y, et al. A multiclass classification method based on deep learning for named entity recognition in electronic medical records[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 New York Scientific Data Summit. Washington D. C., USA: IEEE Press, 2016:1-10.
[11] PENG N, DREDZE M. Improving named entity recognition for Chinese social media with word segmentation representation learning[C]//Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Berlin, Germany: ACL, 2016: 149-155.
[12] 尹光花, 陈鹏. 基于双向LSTM模型的中文命名实体识别[J]. 信息技术与信息化, 2021, (10): 44-46. YIN G H, CHEN P. Chinese named entity recognition based on a bidirectional LSTM model[J]. Information Technology and Informatization, 2021, (10): 44-46. (in Chinese)
[13] 封红旗, 孙杨, 杨森, 等. 基于BERT的中文电子病历命名实体识别[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2023, 44(4): 1220-1227. FENG H Q, SUN Y, YANG S, et al. Chinese electronic medical record named entity recognition based on BERT methods[J]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2023, 44(4): 1220-1227. (in Chinese)
[14] 王为国. 基于Bert的命名实体识别研究[D]. 广州: 广州大学, 2021. WANG W G. Research on named entity recognition based on Bert[D]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University, 2021. (in Chinese)
[15] 陈琛, 刘小云, 方玉华. 融合注意力机制的电子病历命名实体识别[J]. 计算机技术与发展, 2020, 30(10): 216-220. CHEN C, LIU X Y, FANG Y H. Named entity recognition in electronic medical record introducing attention mechanisms[J]. Computer Technology and Development, 2020, 30(10): 216-220. (in Chinese)
[16] 常君. 基于注意力机制的命名实体识别研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2022. CHANG J. Research on named entity recognition based on attention mechanism[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2022. (in Chinese)
[17] GUI T, MA R T, ZHANG Q, et al. CNN-based Chinese NER with lexicon rethinking [C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Macao, China: IJCAI, 2019: 4982-4988.
[18] 颜士军, 朱红梅, 王雅童, 等. 基于字词融合和注意力机制的兽药文本命名实体识别[J].中国农机化学报, 2025, 46(3): 336-342, 352. YAN S J, ZHU H M, WANG Y T, et al. Named entity recognition of veterinary drug text based on character and word fusion and attention mechanism[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2025, 46(3): 336-342, 352. (in Chinese)
[19] WU C X, KE W J, WANG P, et al. ConsistNER: towards instructive NER demonstrations for LLMs with the consistency of ontology and context[C]//Proceedings of the 38th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, USA: AAAI Press, 2024: 19234-19242.
[20] ZHU X Y, DAI F F, GU X Y, et al. GL-NER: generation-aware large language models for few-shot named entity recognition[C]//Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2024: 433-448.
[21] ZHANG Z, ZHAO Y, GAO H, et al. Linkner: linking local named entity recognition models to large language models using uncertainty[C]//Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2024: 4047-4058.
[22] RILOFF E. Automatically constructing a dictionary for information extraction tasks[C]//Proceedings of the 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, USA: AAAI Press, 1993: 811-816.
[23] BOLLEGALA D T, MATSUO Y, ISHIZUKA M. Relational duality: unsupervised extraction of semantic relations between entities on the web[C]//Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010: 151-160.
[24] KAMBHATLA N. Combining lexical, syntactic, and semantic features with maximum entropy models for extractrelations[C]//Proceedings of the ACL 2004 on Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions. Stroudsburg, USA: ACL, 2004: 22-25.
[25]  SUN L, HAN X. A feature-enriched tree kernel for relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Associa tion for Computational Linguistics. Baltimore, USA: ACL, 2014: 61-67.
[26] ZHOU P, SHI W, TIAN J, et al. Attention-based bidirectional long short-term memory networks for relation classification[C]//Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg, USA: ACL, 2016: 207-212.
[27] SAHU S K, CHRISTOPOULOU F, MIWA M, et al. Inter-sentence relation extraction with document-level graph convolutional neural network[C]//Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Florence, Italy: ACL, 2019:4309-4316.
[28] LI J Z. Hyperbolic graph convolutional network relation extraction model combining dependency syntax and contrastive learning[J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2025, 18: 18.
[29] CHEN X, ZHANG N Y, XIE X, et al. KnowPrompt: knowledge-aware prompt-tuning with synergistic optimization for relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2022: 2778 - 2788. [30] WADHWA S, AMIR S, WALLACE B C. Revisiting relation extraction in the era of large language models[C]//Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Toronto, Canada: ACL, 2023: 15566-15589.
[31] ZHOU S Z, MENG Y, JIN B, et al. Grasping the essentials: tailoring large language models for zero-shot relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Miami, USA: ACL, 2024: 13462-13486.
[32] ＨU Ｍ Q, LIU Ｂ. Mining and summarizing customer reviews[C]//Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2004:168-177.
[33] MUKHERJEE A, LIU B. Aspect extraction through semi-supervised modeling[C]//Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Jeju Island, Korea: ACL, 2012: 339-348.
[34] 苏明星, 吴厚月, 李健, 等. 基于多层交互注意力机制的商品属性抽取[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(2):108-118. SU M X, WU H Y, LI J, et al. Extracting commodity attributes based on multi-level interactive attention mechanism[J]. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2023, 7(2):108-118. (in Chinese)
[35] COHEN W W, RICHMAN J. Learning to match and cluster large high-dimensional data sets for data integration[C]//Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2002: 475-480.
[36] NIU X, RONG S, WANG H F, et al. An effective rule miner for instance matching in a web of data[C]//Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2012: 1085-1094.
[37] YAN Z H, PENG R, WY H Y. Similarity propagation based semi-supervised entity alignment[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2024,130: 107787.
[38] COCHINWALA M, KURIEN V, LALK G, et al. Efficient data reconciliation[J]. Information Sciences, 2001, 137(1-4): 1-15.
[39] SARAWAGI S, BHAMIDIPATY A. Interactive deduplication using active learning[C]//Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2002: 269-278.
[40] ZHANG C X, YANG X Z, WANG S L, et al. A multi-view fusion approach for entity alignment[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE 16th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing. Washington D. C., USA: IEEE Press, 2017: 388-393.
[41] BORDES A, USUNIER N, GARCÍA-DURÁN A, et al. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. South Lake Tahoe, USA: Curran Associates Inc., 2013: 2787-2795.
[42] CHEN M, TIAN Y T, CHANG K W, et al. Co-training embeddings of knowledge graphs and entity descriptions for cross-lingual entity alignment[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, USA: AAAI Press, 2018: 3998-4004.
[43] LIN Y K, LIU Z Y, SUN M S, et al. Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, USA: AAAI Press, 2015: 2181-2187.
[44] WANG Z C, LV Q S, LAN X H, et al. Cross-lingual knowledge graph alignment via graph convolutional networks[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Brussels, Belgium: ACL, 2018: 349-357.
[45] XIE F, SONG X, ZENG X, et al. MixTEA: semi-supervised entity alignment with mixture teaching[C]//Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. Singapore: ACL, 2023: 886-896.
[46] LIU B, LAN T C, HUA W, et al. Dependency-aware self-training for entity alignment[C]//Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2022: 780-788.
[47] LIU X K, ZHANG K, LIU Y, et al. RHGN: relation-gated heterogeneous graph network for entity alignment in knowledge graphs[C]//Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023. Toronto, Canada: ACL, 2023: 8683-8696.
[48] TANG J H, ZHAO K F, LI J. A fused Gromov-Wasserstein framework for unsupervised knowledge graph entity alignment[C]//Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023. Toronto, Canada: ACL, 2023: 3320-3334.
[49] MAO X, WANG W T, WU Y B, et al. From alignment to assignment: frustratingly simple unsupervised entity alignment[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. San Francisco, USA: ACL, 2021: 2843-2853.
[50] XIN K X, SUN Z Q, HUA W, et al. Informed multi-context entity alignment[C]//Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2022: 1197-1205.
[51]  JIANG X H, SHEN Y H, SHI Z C, et al. Unlocking the power of large language models for entity alignment[C]//Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Bangkok, Thailand: ACL, 2024: 7566-7583.
[52]  LU C L, LI C X, CHENG J W, et al. Breaking the noise barrier: LLM-guided semantic filtering and enhancement for multi-modal entity alignment[C]//Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Suzhou, China: ACL, 2025: 33141-33155.
[53] YE R, LI X, FANG Y J, et al. A vectorized relational graph convolutional network for multi-relational network alignment[C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Main Track. Macau, China: IJCAI Press, 2019: 4135-4141.
[54] WU Y T, LIU X, FENG Y S, et al. Jointly learning entity and relation representations for entity alignment[C]// Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). Hong Kong, China: ACL, 2019: 240-249.
[55] DONG B B, BU C Y, ZHU Y, et al. Simplified multi-view graph neural network for multilingual knowledge graph completion[J]. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2025, 19(7): 197324.
[56] TANG J, QU M, WANG M Z, et al. Line: large-scale information network embedding[C]// Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. Florence, Italy: IW3C2, 2015: 1067-1077.
[57] CAO Y X, HOU L, LI J Z, et al. Neural collective entity linking[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Santa Fe, USA: ACL, 2018: 675–686.
[58] YANG Y, IRSOY O, RAHMAN K S. Collective entity disambiguation with structured gradient tree boosting[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. New Orleans, USA: ACL, 2018: 777-786.
[59] WANG C Z, SUN X, YU H F, et al. Entity disambiguation leveraging multi-perspective attention[J]. IEEE Access, 2019,7:113963-113974.
[60] DENG C H, DENG H F, LI C R. A scholar disambiguation method based on heterogeneous relation-fusion and attribute enhancement[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 28375-28384.
[61] 姜丽婷, 古丽拉·阿东别克, 马雅静. 基于混合卷积网络的短文本实体消歧[J]. 中文信息学报, 2021, 35(11): 101-108. JIANG L T, GULILA A, MA Y J. Mixed convolution network based entity disambiguation for short text[J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2021, 35(11): 101-108. (in Chinese)
[62] TASAWONG P, LIMKONCHOTIWAT P, MANAKU P, et al. Efficient overshadowed entity disambiguation by mitigating shortcut learning[C]//Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Miami, USA:ACL, 2024: 15313-15321.
[63] ZHU G G, IGLESIAS A C. Exploiting semantic similarity for named entity disambiguation in knowledge graphs[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2018, 101:8-24.
[64] 石水倩, 金晶, 沈耕宇, 等. 基于多元相似度融合的中文命名实体消歧方法[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2024, 8(2): 56-64. SHI S Q, JIN J, SHEN G Y, et al. Chinese named entity disambiguation based on multiple similarity fusion[J]. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2024, 8(2): 56-64. (in Chinese)
[65] MUÑOZ-JORDÁN D, RUIZ G, CABRIADA P, et al. 3SA: an entity-linking algorithm for the Institution Name Disambiguation problem in affiliations using edit distance[J]. Scientometrics, 2025, 130: 4073-4091.
[66] DONG X L, BERTI-EQUILLE L, SRIVASTAVA D, et al. Integrating conflicting data: the role of source dependence[J]//Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2009, 2(1): 550-561．
[67] REKATSINAS T, JOGLEKAR M, GARCIA-MOLINA H, et al. SLiMFast: guaranteed results for data fusion and source reliability[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2017: 1399-1414.
[68] PENG H, ZHANG P F, TANG J Y, et al. Detect-Then-Resolve: enhancing knowledge graph conflict resolution with large language model[J]. Mathematics, MDPI, 2024, 12(15): 1-15.
[69] SCHOENMACKERS S, DAVIS J, ETZIONI O, et al. Learning first-order horn clauses from web text[C]//Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, USA: ACL, 2010: 1088-1098.
[70] GALÁRRAGA L A, TEFLIOUDI C, HOSE K, et al. AMIE: association rule mining under incomplete evidence in ontological knowledge bases[C]//Proceedings of the Web. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: ACM Press, 2013: 413-422.  22nd International Conference World Wide
[71] NICKEL M, TRESP V, KRIEGEL H P. A three-way model for collective learning on multi-relational data[C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning. Bellevue, USA: Omnipress, 2011: 809-816.
[72] NICKEL M, TRESP V, KRIEGEL H P. Factorizing YAGO: scalable machine learning for linked data[C]//Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2012: 271-280.
[73] WU Y B, ZHU D H, LIAO X W, et al. Knowledge graph reasoning based on paths of tensor factorization[J]. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2017, 30(5): 473-480.
[74] TRIVEDI R, DAI H J, WANG Y C, et al. Know-evolve: deep temporal reasoning for dynamic knowledge graphs[C]//Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning. Sydney, Australia: JMLR, 2017: 3462-3471.
[75] DASGUPTA S S, RAY S N, TALUKDAR P. HyTE: hyper-plane-based temporally aware knowledge graph embedding[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Brussels, Belgium: ACL, 2018: 2001-2011.
[76] CHEN X L, CHEN M H, SHI W J, et al. Embedding uncertain knowledge graphs[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, USA: AAAI Press, 2019: 3363-3370.
[77] BORDES A, GLOROT X, WESTON J, et al. A semantic matching energy function for learning with multi-relational data[J].Machine Learning, 2014, 94(2): 233-259.
[78] NICKEL M, ROSASCO L, POGGIO T. Holographic embeddings of knowledge graphs[C]//Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, USA: AAAI Press, 2016: 1955-1961.
[79] TROUILLON T, DANCE C R, WELBL J, et al. Knowledge graph completion via complex tensor factorization[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2017, 18(1): 4735-4772.
[80] WANG Z G, LI J Z. Text-enhanced representation learning for knowledge graph[C]//Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, USA: AAAI Press, 2016: 1293-1299.
[81] QU M, TANG J. Probabilistic logic neural networks for reasoning[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook, USA: Curran Associates Inc., 2019: 7712-7722.
[82] ZHANG W, PAUDEL B, WANG L, et al. Iteratively learning embeddings and rules for knowledge graph reasoning[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2019: 2366-2377.
[83] TAY Y, TUAN L A, PHAN M C, et al. Multi-task neural network for non-discrete attribute prediction in knowledge graphs[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2017: 1029-1038.
[84] DETTMERS T, MINERVINI P, STENETORP P, et al. Convolutional 2D knowledge graph embeddings[C]//Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, USA: AAAI Press, 2018: 1811-1818.
[85] LI S J, CHEN S D, OUYANG X Y, et al. Joint learning based on multi-shaped filters for knowledge graph completion[J]. High Technology Letters, 2021, 27(1): 43-52.
[86] NEELAKANTAN A, ROTH B, MCCALLUM A. Compositional vector space models for knowledge base inference[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. Beijing, China: ACL, 2015: 156-166.
[87] GUO L B, ZHANG Q H, GE W Y, et al. DSKG: a deep sequential model for knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of 2018 China Conference on Knowledge Graph and Semantic Computing. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2018: 65-77.
[88] LI Z X, JIN X L, GUAN S, et al. Path reasoning over knowledge graph: a multi-agent and reinforcement learning based method[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. Washington D. C., USA: IEEE Press, 2018: 929-936.
[89] WANG Q, JI Y D, HAO Y S, et al. GRL: knowledge graph completion with GAN-based reinforcement learning[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2020, 209: 106421.
[90] TIWARI P, ZHU H, PANDEY H M. DAPath: distance-aware knowledge graph reasoning based on deep reinforcement learning[J]. Neural Networks, 2021, 135: 1-12.
[91] SCHLICHTKRULL M, KIPF T N, BLOEM P, et al. Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks[C]//Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on the Semantic Web. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2018: 593-607.
[92] BANSAL T, JUAN D C, RAVI S, et al. A2N: attending to neighbors for knowledge graph inference[C]//Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Florence, Italy: ACL, 2019: 4387-4392.
[93] TERU K K, DENIS E G, HAMILTON W L. Inductive relation prediction by subgraph reasoning[C]//Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning. New York, USA: PMLR, 2020: 9448-9457.
[94] ZHU L, ZHAO W J, BAI L Y, et al. Quadruple mention text-enhanced temporal knowledge graph reasoning[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 133(PA): 108058.
[95] CHANG H, YE J N, AVILA A L, et al. Path-based explanation for knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Barcelona, Spain: ACM Press, 2024: 231-242.
[96]  CAO S F, LI X D, GONG Z Z, et al. Multiple concepts and cross-attention based knowledge graph completion[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2025, 55: 851.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export