[1] APWG. Anti-phishing working group phishing activity trends reports[EB/OL]. [2025-04-02]. https://apwg.org/trendsreports. [2] LIN Y, LIU R F, DIVAKARAN D M, et al. Phishpedia: a hybrid deep learning based approach to visually identify phishing webpages[C]//Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium. [S. l.]: USENIX, 2021: 3793-3810. [3] LIU R F, LIN Y, YANG X D, et al. Inferring phishing intention via webpage appearance and dynamics: a deep vision based approach[C]//Proceedings of the USENIX Security Symposium. [S. l.]: USENIX, 2022: 1633-1650. [4] LIU R F, LIN Y F, ZHANG Y, et al. knowledge expansion and counterfactual interaction for reference-based phishing detection[C]//Proceedings of the 32nd USENIX Security Symposium. [S. l.]: USENIX, 2023: 4139-4156. [5] LIU R, LIN Y, TEOH X, et al. Less defined knowledge and more true alarms: reference-based phishing detection without a pre-defined reference list[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd USENIX Security Symposium. [S. l.]: USENIX, 2024: 523-540. [6] LI Y X, HUANG C Y, DENG S M, et al. KnowPhish: large language models meet multimodal knowledge graphs for enhancing reference-based phishing detection[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd USENIX Security Symposium. [ S. l.]: USENIX, 2024: 793-810. [7] LEWIS P, PEREZ E, PIKTUS A, et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020, 33: 9459-9474. [8] VirusTotal[EB/OL]. [2025-04-02]. https://www.virustotal.com/gui/home/upload. [9] Microsoft SmartScreen[EB/OL]. (2024-07-10) [2025-04-02]. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/operating-system-security/virus-and-threat-protection/microsoft-defender-smartscreen/. [10] Google safe browsing[EB/OL]. [2025-04-02]. https://safebrowsing.google.com. [11] 张震, 张三峰, 杨望. 基于图对比学习的恶意域名检测方法[J]. 软件学报, 2024, 35(10): 4837-4858. ZHANG Z, ZHANG S F, YANG W. Malicious domain name detection method based on graph contrastive learning[J]. Journal of Software, 2024, 35(10): 4837-4858. (in Chinese) [12] 靳婕靖, 张永斌, 冉崇善, 等. 错拼抢注域名研究综述[J]. 计算机工程, 2018, 44(3): 156-165.JIN J J, ZHANG Y B, RAN C S, et al. Research survey on typosquatting domain names[J]. Computer Engineering, 2018, 44(3): 156-165. (in Chinese) [13] KIM T, PARK N, HONG J, et al. Phishing URL detection: a network-based approach robust to evasion[C]//Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2022: 1769-1782. [14] GUO B Y, ZHANG Y Y, XU C X, et al. HinPhish: an effective phishing detection approach based on heterogeneous information networks[J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(20): 9733. [15] 金建栋, 黄正, 胡占宇, 等. 基于智能体工作流的高级钓鱼邮件检测方法[J]. 通信学报, 2024, 45(S2): 59-68. JIN J D, HUANG Z, HU Z Y, et al. PhishingAgent: an agentic workflow method for advanced phishing email detection[J]. Journal on Communications, 2024, 45(S2): 59-68. (in Chinese) [16] TAN C C L, CHIEW K L, YONG K S C, et al. Hybrid phishing detection using joint visual and textual identity[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 220: 119723. [17] HE B W, CHEN Y, CHEN Z, et al. TxPhishScope: towards detecting and understanding transaction-based phishing on ethereum[C]//Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2023: 120-134. [18] KONDRACKI B, AZAD B A, STAROV O, et al. Catching transparent phish: analyzing and detecting MITM phishing toolkits[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2021: 36-50. [19] ZHANG P H, OEST A, CHO H, et al. CrawlPhish: large-scale analysis of client-side cloaking techniques in phishing[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). San Francisco, USA: IEEE Press, 2021: 1109-1124. [20] ROY S S, THOTA P, NARAGAM K V, et al. From chatbots to phishbots? : Phishing scam generation in commercial large language models[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). San Francisco, USA: IEEE Press, 2024: 36-54. [21] Wikipedia[EB/OL]. [2025-04-02]. https://www.wikipedia.org/. [22] LE POCHAT V, VAN GOETHEM T, TAJALIZADEHKHOOB S, et al. Tranco: a research-oriented top sites ranking hardened against manipulation[EB/OL]. [2025-04-02]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.01156. [23] Phishtank[EB/OL]. [2025-04-02]. https://phishtank.com. [24] Openphish[EB/OL]. [2025-04-02]. https://openphish.com. [25] Alexa[EB/OL]. [2025-04-02]. https://www.alexa.com/topsites. [26] ES S, JAMES J, ESPINOSA A L, et al. RAGAs: automated evaluation of retrieval augmented generation[C]//Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations. St. Julians, Malta: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024: 150-158. |