[1] CHEN X Y, AN J P, XIONG Z H, et al. Covert communications: a comprehensive survey[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2023, 25(2): 1173-1198. [2] ALSHAMRANI A, MYNENI S, CHOWDHARY A, et al. A survey on advanced persistent threats: techniques, solutions, challenges, and research opportunities[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2019, 21(2): 1851-1877. [3] KAISER F K, DARDIK U, ELITZUR A, et al. Attack hypotheses generation based on threat intelligence knowledge graph[J]. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2023, 20(6): 4793-4809. [4] KOTSIAS J, AHMAD A, SCHEEPERS R. Adopting and integrating cyber-threat intelligence in a commercial organisation[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2023, 32(1): 35-51. [5] BIANCO D. Enterprise detection & response[EB/OL].[2025-05-05].https://detect-respond.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-pyramid-of-pain.html. [6] RAMSDALE A, SHIAELES S, KOLOKOTRONIS N. A comparative analysis of cyber-threat intelligence sources, formats and languages[J]. Electronics, 2020, 9(5): 824. [7] ALAM M T, BHUSAL D, PARK Y, et al. Looking beyond IoCs: automatically extracting attack patterns from external CTI[EB/OL].[2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01753. [8] STROM B E, APPLEBAUM A, MILLER D P, et al. MITRE ATT&CK: design and philosophy[EB/OL].[2025-05-05]. https://attack.mitre.org/docs/ATTACK_Design_and_Philosophy_March_2020.pdf. [9] KIM H, KIM H. Comparative experiment on TTP classification with class imbalance using oversampling from CTI dataset[J]. Security and Communication Networks, 2022, 2022: 5021125. [10] NGUYEN T, ŠRNDIĆ N, NETH A. Noise contrastive estimation-based matching framework for low-resource security attack pattern recognition[EB/OL].[2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10337. [11] MENG C, JIANG Z W, WANG Q Y, et al. Instantiating standards: enabling standard-driven text TTP extraction with evolvable memory[EB/OL].[2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09261. [12] LEGOY V S M. Retrieving ATT&CK tactics and techniques in cyber threat reports[EB/OL].[2025-05-05]. https://essay.utwente.nl/fileshare/file/80012/Legoy_MA_EEMCS.pdf. [13] DOMSCHOT E, RAMYAA R, SMITH M R. Improving automated labeling for ATT&CK tactics in malware threat reports[J]. Digital Threats: Research and Practice, 2024, 5(1): 1-16. [14] RAHMAN M R, HEZAVEH R M, WILLIAMS L. What are the attackers doing now? Automating cyberthreat intelligence extraction from text on pace with the changing threat landscape: a survey[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, 55(12): 1-36. [15] FAYYAZI R, TAGHDIMI R, YANG S J. Advancing TTP analysis: harnessing the power of large language models with retrieval augmented generation[C]//Proceedings of the Annual Computer Security Applications Conference Workshops (ACSAC Workshops). Washington D.C.,USA:IEEE Press,2025: 255-261. [16] LEGOY V, CASELLI M, SEIFERT C, et al. Automated retrieval of ATT&CK tactics and techniques for cyber threat reports[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14322. [17] YU Z, WANG J F, TANG B H, et al. Tactics and techniques classification in cyber threat intelligence[J]. The Computer Journal, 2023, 66(8): 1870-1881. [18] SATVAT K, GJOMEMO R, VENKATAKRISHNAN V N. Extractor: extracting attack behavior from threat reports[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P). Washington D.C.,USA:IEEE Press,2021: 598-615. [19] GE W H, WANG J F, LIN T C, et al. Explainable cyber threat behavior identification based on self-adversarial topic generation[J]. Computers & Security, 2023, 132: 103369. [20] GE W H, CUI Z Y, WANG J F, et al. MetaCluster: a universal interpretable classification framework for cybersecurity[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2024, 19: 3829-3843. [21] HUSARI G, AL-SHAER E, AHMED M, et al. TTPDrill: automatic and accurate extraction of threat actions from unstructured text of CTI sources[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. New York,USA:ACM Press,2017: 103-115. [22] NIAKANLAHIJI A, WEI J P, CHU B T. A natural language processing based trend analysis of advanced persistent threat techniques[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). Washington D.C.,USA:IEEE Press,2019: 2995-3000. [23] FAYYAZI R, YANG S J. On the uses of large language models to interpret ambiguous cyberattack descriptions[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.14062. [24] MEZZI E, MASSACCI F, TUMA K. Large language models are unreliable for cyber threat intelligence[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23175. [25] RAHMAN M R, WROBLEWSKI B, MATTHEWS Q, et al. ChronoCTI: mining knowledge graph of temporal relations among cyberattack actions[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). Washington D.C.,USA:IEEE Press,2025: 420-429. [26] HU Y L, ZOU F T, HAN J J, et al. LLM-TIKG: treat intelligence knowledge graph construction utilizing large language model[J]. Computers & Security, 2024, 145: 103999. [27] YOU Y Z, JIANG J, JIANG Z W, et al. TIM: threat context-enhanced TTP intelligence mining on unstructured threat data[J]. Cybersecurity, 2022, 5(1): 3. [28] GE W H, WANG J F. SeqMask: behavior extraction over cyber threat intelligence via multi-instance learning[J]. The Computer Journal, 2024, 67(1): 253-273. [29] LIU C J, WANG J F, CHEN X R. Threat intelligence ATT&CK extraction based on the attention transformer hierarchical recurrent neural network[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 122: 108826. [30] WANG L, MA C, FENG X Y, et al. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents[J]. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2024, 18(6): 186345. [31] GUO T C, CHEN X Y, WANG Y Q, et al. Large language model based multi-agents: a survey of progress and challenges[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01680. [32] QU C L, DAI S H, WEI X C, et al. Tool learning with large language models: a survey[J]. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2025, 19(8): 198343. [33] WEI J, ZOU K. EDA: easy data augmentation techniques for boosting performance on text classification tasks[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.11196. [34] RAHMAN M R, WILLIAMS L. From threat reports to continuous threat intelligence: a comparison of attack technique extraction methods from textual artifacts[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02601. [35] CHAWLA N V, BOWYER K W, HALL L O, et al. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique[J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2002, 16: 321-357. [36] LIU J, YAN J J, JIANG J, et al. TriCTI: an actionable cyber threat intelligence discovery system via trigger-enhanced neural network[J]. Cybersecurity, 2022, 5(1): 8. [37] WU X, LV S W, ZANG L J, et al. Conditional BERT contextual augmentation[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06705. [38] AGHAEI E, NIU X, SHADID W, et al. SecureBERT: a domain-specific language model for cybersecurity[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.02685. [39] BROWN T, MANN B, RYDER N, et al. Language models are few-shot learners[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165. [40] FANG L Y, LEE G G, ZHAI X M. Using GPT-4 to augment unbalanced data for automatic scoring[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18365. [41] FANG Y H, LI X Z, THOMAS S W, et al. ChatGPT as data augmentation for compositional generalization: a case study in open intent detection[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.13517. [42] DAI H X, LIU Z L, LIAO W X, et al. AugGPT: leveraging ChatGPT for text data augmentation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 2025, 11(3): 907-918. [43] 于丰瑞, 杜彦辉. 网络威胁技战术情报识别提取生成式技术研究[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2025, 19(1): 118-131.YU F R, DU Y H. Research on generative techniques for identifying and extracting tactics, tech-niques and procedures[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science & Technology, 2025, 19(1): 118-131. (in Chinese) [44] Facebook Research. fasttext: library for efficient learning of word representations and sentence classifications[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://fasttext.cc/. [45] 于丰瑞. 网络威胁技战术情报自动化识别提取研究综述[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2024, 60(13): 1-22.YU F R. Survey on automated recognition and extraction of TTPs[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2024, 60(13): 1-22. (in Chinese) [46] LI M M, ZHENG R F, LIU L, et al. Extraction of threat actions from threat-related articles using multi-label machine learning classification method[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Safety Produce Informatization (IICSPI). Washington D.C.,USA:IEEE Press,2020: 428-431. [47] LI Z Y, ZENG J, CHEN Y, et al. AttacKG: constructing technique knowledge graph from cyber threat intelligence reports[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.07093. [48] 于忠坤, 王俊峰, 唐宾徽, 等. 基于注意力机制和特征融合的网络威胁情报技战术分类研究[J]. 四川大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 59(5): 90-97.YU Z K, WANG J F, TANG B H, et al. Research on the classification of cyber threat intelligence techniques and tactics based on attention mechanism and feature fusion[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 59(5): 90-97. (in Chinese) [49] ABDEEN B, AL-SHAER E, SINGHAL A, et al. SMET: semantic mapping of CVE to ATT&CK and its application to cybersecurity[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-37586-6_15. [50] KUMARASINGHE U, LEKSSAYS A, SENCAR H T, et al. Semantic ranking for automated adversarial technique annotation in security text[C]//Proceedings of the 19th ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York,USA:ACM Press,2024: 49-62. [51] RANI N, SAHA B, MAURYA V, et al. TTPHunter: automated extraction of actionable intelligence as TTPs from narrative threat reports[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369204373_TTPHunter_Automated_Extraction_of_Actionable_Intelligence_as_TTPs_from_Narrative_Threat_Reports. [52] ORBINATO V, BARBARACI M, NATELLA R, et al. Automatic mapping of unstructured cyber threat intelligence: an experimental study: (practical experience report)[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE 33rd International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE). Washington D.C.,USA:IEEE Press,2022: 181-192. [53] RANI N, SAHA B, MAURYA V, et al. TTPXHunter: actionable threat intelligence extraction as TTPs from finished cyber threat reports[J]. Digital Threats: Research and Practice, 2024, 5(4): 1-19. [54] LIU X, TAN Y, XIAO Z H, et al. Not the end of story: an evaluation of ChatGPT-driven vulnerability description mappings[C]//Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023. [S.l.]:ACL,2023: 3724-3731. [55] SIRACUSANO G, SANVITO D, GONZALEZ R, et al. Time for a CTI on automated analysis of cyber threat intelligence in the wild[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10214. [56] BORGEAUD S, MENSCH A, HOFFMANN J, et al. Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokens[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.04426. [57] XU M, WANG H T, LIU J H, et al. Threat Pilot: attack-driven threat intelligence extraction[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10872. [58] GURU K, MOSS R J, KOCHENDERFER M J. On technique identification and threat-actor attribution using LLMs and embedding models[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11547. [59] ZHANG Y H, DU T W, MA Y S, et al. AttacKG+: boosting attack graph construction with large language models[J]. Computers & Security, 2025, 150: 104220. [60] ZHANG J, WEN H, LI L, et al. UniTTP: a unified framework for tactics, techniques, and procedures mapping in cyber threats[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE 23rd International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom). Washington D.C.,USA:IEEE Press,2025: 1580-1588. [61] Hugging Face. Security-TTP-Mapping [EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://huggingface.co/datasets/tumeteor/Security-TTP-Mapping/tree/main. [62] JI H Y, YANG J, CHAI L Z, et al. SEvenLLM: benchmarking, eliciting, and enhancing abilities of large language models in cyber threat intelligence[EB/OL]. [2025-05-05]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.03446. |